Redundancy: Good or Bad?
by Robert Mohns - April 29, 2008 / 12:18pm
A couple weeks ago, I was updating my rather outdated Ubuntu Linux virtual machine from Feisty Fawn to Gutsy Gibbon. The process was pleasantly painless, but I did note something a little odd in the interface. The package manager posted an informative status dialogue while downloading updates. The title bar says "Downloading package files". And then again, inside the box it says "Downloading package files".

The structural information designer part me objects to the redundancy of information. It doesn't make sense to have the user read the same thing twice. It wastes both the developer's time presenting it twice and the user's time reading it twice, and it adds another item that must be checked as part of the QA process.
But the user coaching side of me points out that this pretty much ensures the user will notice what's going on. It doesn't matter whether they read the window title or its contents, because they'll get the same message. And thus it's worth the extra developer and QA time.
Help me out here: is informational redundancy good or bad?
4 Comments
I have no problem with the redundancy.