Archived iMarc Websites

Walk with us down memory lane, at http://old.imarc.net

We set up this site to "showcase" all the old versions of iMarc.net. No, we're not necessarily proud of that 1997 site design, but it's worth showing for a couple reasons:
  1. We've been around for a long time - The sites from 1997 and 1998 are about 85 years old in "web years"
  2. We've been making websites for a long time
  3. It's interesting to see how styles have changed
  4. This proves our backups work!
We've removed dynamic content from the archived sites, and I'm sure there are some broken links, but still, they're fun to see.

Visit http://old.imarc.net
Comments have been turned off on this blog.
Read something more recent.

Statements and opinions expressed in this blog and any comments made are the private opinions of the respective poster, and, as such, iMarc LLC is neither responsible nor liable for such content.

Meet The Author

Dave Tufts

Vice President, Director of Technology

Search

Recent Blog Posts

Recent Comments

  • Lunchroom Banter (Volume XX)

    Nick commented: Since Bill didn't do it, I will. "Oh snap!"

  • iMarcians with staying power

    Nick commented: Congratulations on the anniversaries. I had a professor tell me early on at the Art Institute that "you can expect to change web jobs every 2-3 years until you settle somewhere". I love proving this guy wrong every day. Congrats again.

  • Twitter, Alone, Is Not Customer Service

    Jay G commented: Same here, and my story is with Alaska Air, too. Their website said the customer service phone number was open something like 8am-8pm PST, but this was after hours, so I tweeted. Lo, and behold, I got a tweet response in 10 minutes with the 24/7 phone number. But this didn't change the confusion from their website…

  • Mobile browsers: Here's the data

    Robert Mohns commented: The data comes from visitors to iMarc.net — an important detail I forgot to include! — not the web as a whole. As for why so little Flash on mobile devices… I'd say this is because even Flash Lite is pretty resource intensive, and it's just not essential to the core content most people need to access. I don't think it has a lot to do…

  • Mobile browsers: Here's the data

    Jason Cronkhite commented: Robert, The data on Flash is interesting. What is your source? I am interested because of my interest in a live streaming company. Further, I'm curious why this is the case for Flash. Is there any merit to HTML5 that Jobs argues? Do you think this has anything to do with mobile network capacity for streaming…

We heart Visitors

  • iMarc
  • 14 Inn Street
  • Newburyport, MA 01950
  • Phone: (978) 462-8848
  • Fax: (978) 462-8807
  • Directions

Contact Us

Whether you have a huge project specification or just want to talk about updating your site, we’re here to help. Fill out the form, and we’ll get right back to you.

Contact Us
  • All Fields Required

Close