Building to code

If website renders just fine in all the major browsers, that's good enough, right?

Seriously, what is the business benefit to a site that happens to comply with web standards? Sure, us developers love it, but why does anyone else?

Answer: It's like building to the building code. You don't have to do it, and your house will probably stand just fine. But building to code helps ensure that your roof can stand the load of a heavy snowfall.... that the wiring won't catch fire from improper grounding if a kitchen appliance fails... that the air conditioning can handle a super-hot summer week and the heating handle the occasional deep freeze... that you can put an addition onto it without a lot of blood, sweat, tears and money... that you won't be spending a ton of money to fix problems you discover at the change of each season.

Probably doesn't validate:

the worst phone wiring in Scotland

Neat doesn't mean safe:

code violations

Doing it right

You can ignore web standards and build something that works okay. But that's not the same as building it right the first time. Build a good, standards-compliant website, and it will take you less work to maintain and will be easier to add on to.

Do it right the first time, and you won't have to pay to fix it over and over.

Leave a Comment

  • We'll be happy to render the following tags if you choose to use them:
    <a>, <em>, <cite>, <strong>, <ul>, <ol>, <li>, <code>, and <pre>.

    Please remember to markup in <code> tags. Example:
    <code><em>foo</em></code> will print <em>foo</em>

    We'll automatically convert fully-formed URLs with ‘http://’ to links, no need to thank us.

Statements and opinions expressed in this blog and any comments made are the private opinions of the respective poster, and, as such, iMarc LLC is neither responsible nor liable for such content.

Meet The Author

Robert Mohns

Information Architect

Search

Recent Blog Posts

Recent Comments

  • 10 years and a Les Paul

    Jaime commented: Is that Dave Despres in the flesh?

  • The Scientific Method

    TJ Kelly commented: "After 2 seconds on the Chamber page, she realized that she wasn't interested and wanted to get back to iMarc." Therein lies my favorite argument for opening links in the same window.

  • The Scientific Method

    Angelo Simeoni commented: Our issue tracker has a user option to open issue links in a new window. I can't remember if that's enabled by default, but that's one good use case. Imagine if it were default browser behavior to open all links in a new window. I'm going to mention that the next time someone suggests that interaction. Ironically…

  • The Scientific Method

    Marc Amos commented: When somebody who's signing my checks asks me to make their links automatically open in a new window, the scenario you describe above is pretty much the same scenario I describe to them as 'my professional opinion.' I ask them to consider what happens when the user aims for the Back button and it doesn't…

  • The Scientific Method

    Errol Sayre commented: Your key point says it all: "anyone who wanted that behavior was sophisticated enough to create the behavior on demand" My favorite are sites that go to such great lengths to produce open in a new-window-links that they make it impossible for you to right-click and choose "open in new tab". (Generally due to a…

We heart Visitors

  • iMarc
  • 14 Inn Street
  • Newburyport, MA 01950
  • Phone: (978) 462-8848
  • Fax: (978) 462-8807
  • Directions

Contact Us

Whether you have a huge project specification or just want to talk about updating your site, we’re here to help. Fill out the form, and we’ll get right back to you.

Contact Us
  • All Fields Required

Close