Bureaucracy at the W3C

The W3C is an international group that develops web standards. Some people accuse the group of being slow and inefficient. Since the W3C's director is the guy who invented the World Wide Web, it's hard to speak poorly of the organization... but I will.

Today's announcement is a perfect example of the how the W3C got their reputation of being slow to define standards.

The W3C announced today that the XHTML2 group will stop working at the end of this year. Starting next year, they'll put all the smart XHTML2 people on the HTML5 team. By doing this, the W3C hopes to "accelerate the progress of HTML 5".

That's great! Unless you're on the XHTML2 team.

Diving deeper into their FAQ, we see that the XHTML2 docs will stop development, only to be published as "Group Notes".

So these poor XHTML2 guys get to spend the next 6 month working on a project that has already been killed — basically just taking notes. What a waste of resources. Is the W3C filled with such bureaucracy that they can't amend the XHTML2 charter?

If they've already decided on killing the group, kill it now. Put the resources to work on a productive project that will actually see the light of day.

Web developers are already excited about HTML 5, but if this announcement represents how the W3C "accelerates", we've got a long wait.

Leave a Comment

  • We'll be happy to render the following tags if you choose to use them:
    <a>, <em>, <cite>, <strong>, <ul>, <ol>, <li>, <code>, and <pre>.

    Please remember to markup in <code> tags. Example:
    <code><em>foo</em></code> will print <em>foo</em>

    We'll automatically convert fully-formed URLs with ‘http://’ to links, no need to thank us.

Statements and opinions expressed in this blog and any comments made are the private opinions of the respective poster, and, as such, iMarc LLC is neither responsible nor liable for such content.

Meet The Author

Dave Tufts

Vice President, Director of Technology

Search

Recent Blog Posts

Recent Comments

  • 10 years and a Les Paul

    Jaime commented: Is that Dave Despres in the flesh?

  • The Scientific Method

    TJ Kelly commented: "After 2 seconds on the Chamber page, she realized that she wasn't interested and wanted to get back to iMarc." Therein lies my favorite argument for opening links in the same window.

  • The Scientific Method

    Angelo Simeoni commented: Our issue tracker has a user option to open issue links in a new window. I can't remember if that's enabled by default, but that's one good use case. Imagine if it were default browser behavior to open all links in a new window. I'm going to mention that the next time someone suggests that interaction. Ironically…

  • The Scientific Method

    Marc Amos commented: When somebody who's signing my checks asks me to make their links automatically open in a new window, the scenario you describe above is pretty much the same scenario I describe to them as 'my professional opinion.' I ask them to consider what happens when the user aims for the Back button and it doesn't…

  • The Scientific Method

    Errol Sayre commented: Your key point says it all: "anyone who wanted that behavior was sophisticated enough to create the behavior on demand" My favorite are sites that go to such great lengths to produce open in a new-window-links that they make it impossible for you to right-click and choose "open in new tab". (Generally due to a…

We heart Visitors

  • iMarc
  • 14 Inn Street
  • Newburyport, MA 01950
  • Phone: (978) 462-8848
  • Fax: (978) 462-8807
  • Directions

Contact Us

Whether you have a huge project specification or just want to talk about updating your site, we’re here to help. Fill out the form, and we’ll get right back to you.

Contact Us
  • All Fields Required

Close