Redundancy: Good or Bad?

A couple weeks ago, I was updating my rather outdated Ubuntu Linux virtual machine from Feisty Fawn to Gutsy Gibbon. The process was pleasantly painless, but I did note something a little odd in the interface. The package manager posted an informative status dialogue while downloading updates. The title bar says "Downloading package files". And then again, inside the box it says "Downloading package files".

Screenshot of a status dialog box in Ubuntu Linux

The structural information designer part me objects to the redundancy of information. It doesn't make sense to have the user read the same thing twice. It wastes both the developer's time presenting it twice and the user's time reading it twice, and it adds another item that must be checked as part of the QA process.

But the user coaching side of me points out that this pretty much ensures the user will notice what's going on. It doesn't matter whether they read the window title or its contents, because they'll get the same message. And thus it's worth the extra developer and QA time.

Help me out here: is informational redundancy good or bad?

Comments

Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 / 12:49pm Peter R. Wood said…

You definitely want it in the title bar, since the contents of the title bar are used to identify the window in many contexts (task bars, task managers, windowing managers, etc). As for putting it inside the window itself, I feel the same way as you... it does seem redundant to have it in both places, and not only that, but to have those to places visually so close together. I guess for myself, I would tend to tune out the window titles when looking at the window itself - I only pay attention to them in the context of switching between various tasks, and once I've switched to a task I already know what it is, so there's no need for the content to be repeated. I don't know what Joe Average user would do. Seems like some user research would be good.

Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 / 1:57pm Will Bond said…

Peter nailed it on the head. Usability trumps redundancy. I don't look at the window title when I have a window open, but I do care about the title when it is minimized. Thus having it in both places is great.

Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 / 2:32pm Nick said…

If you make it the same variable I don't care if its in there 100 times, the QA part is easy. I've also noticed this type of thing in other installation packages and to be honest I don't mind. I find that most times I only read half of whats in those boxes anyway.

Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 / 3:08pm Dave Tufts said…

I have no problem with the redundancy. I have no problem with the redundancy.

Comments have been turned off on this blog.
Read something more recent.

Statements and opinions expressed in this blog and any comments made are the private opinions of the respective poster, and, as such, iMarc LLC is neither responsible nor liable for such content.

Meet The Author

Robert Mohns

Information Architect

Search

Recent Blog Posts

Recent Comments

  • A better tool

    Dave Tufts commented: Just downloaded Soulver - it's great. I also like using the search box in my browser or Google. Similar, linear layout to Soulver. (for the record, that giant calculator on my desk looked like a small regular-sized calculator in the picture on Amazon)

  • Lunchroom Banter (Volume XX)

    Nick commented: Since Bill didn't do it, I will. "Oh snap!"

  • iMarcians with staying power

    Nick commented: Congratulations on the anniversaries. I had a professor tell me early on at the Art Institute that "you can expect to change web jobs every 2-3 years until you settle somewhere". I love proving this guy wrong every day. Congrats again.

  • Twitter, Alone, Is Not Customer Service

    Jay G commented: Same here, and my story is with Alaska Air, too. Their website said the customer service phone number was open something like 8am-8pm PST, but this was after hours, so I tweeted. Lo, and behold, I got a tweet response in 10 minutes with the 24/7 phone number. But this didn't change the confusion from their website…

  • Mobile browsers: Here's the data

    Robert Mohns commented: The data comes from visitors to iMarc.net — an important detail I forgot to include! — not the web as a whole. As for why so little Flash on mobile devices… I'd say this is because even Flash Lite is pretty resource intensive, and it's just not essential to the core content most people need to access. I don't think it has a lot to do…

We heart Visitors

  • iMarc
  • 14 Inn Street
  • Newburyport, MA 01950
  • Phone: (978) 462-8848
  • Fax: (978) 462-8807
  • Directions

Contact Us

Whether you have a huge project specification or just want to talk about updating your site, we’re here to help. Fill out the form, and we’ll get right back to you.

Contact Us
  • All Fields Required

Close